What makes some bands work while others fall to the sidelines or putter along getting dates and making some money, but never rising to the top? Why is it that certain groups with impeccable musical credentials and capable of making marvelous music are relatively unrecognized while other whose work is objectively inferior achieve greater success? What constitutes the “It” factor that causes some bands to achieve fame and a relative degree of fortune, while bands lacking “It” toil on, never quite understanding what's holding them back? The answer to these questions lies in identifying a set of sub-factors and working to build upon them while eliminating other factors that reduce the chances of success. This takes huge amounts of work and a great deal of thought and development. One thing's for certain, though. It's not “all about the music.”
Becoming a fine bluegrass band begins with musicianship, but certainly doesn't end there. For the most part, it can be said that most players in professional bluegrass bands play their instruments at a professional level. Individual musicians need to be able to blend together within the group to become a unified and complementary ensemble. Making bluegrass music is a highly competitive enterprise, but doing it in a band means setting the bar high while working to create a sound, a vibe, that's bigger than any individual within the group. Bands are also billed as acts. The word “act” suggests a group of musicians should at least seem to be enjoying themselves and each other in what they're doing. Making music should look difficult as well as eminently enjoyable. The more a band acts as if it were together and having a great time, the more the audience and the musicians themselves will believe this to be true.
Having great material that becomes immediately associated with the band is a crucial element in having “It.” Great material means selecting songs well-suited to the sound and nature of the band and, better still, having fine songs come from band members themselves. No matter how well a band presents songs by Bill Monroe, Flatt & Scruggs, Jimmy Martin, or the Stanley Brothers, they're still a cover band if they do more than about twenty percent of the traditional material in a fashion similar to that of the pioneers. It's not necessary for a band to have song writers, but it sure is helpful. It is necessary, however, for a band to select original material which tastefully represents the sound and image they wish to cultivate. Highly successful bands develop such a recognizable sound that a listener to XM/Sirius radio or a personal player can identify them after three to five notes without looking at the radio's screen. The more material a band originates, the more recognizable they can become.
Honesty and authenticity really work for a band in helping it rise above the crowd. Unfortunately, neither of these elements can be manufactured, although some artists seem to get away with fooling the audience longer than others do. In the end, a manufactured image will show itself. How are these very important elements of a successful band made apparent to an audience? First, it's very important that members of the band enjoy each other and love making music together. If there's an unhappy person in the band, no amount of showmanship or faked camaraderie can cover the difficulties forever. Spontaneity is another element that works in many groups' favor. A group that can authentically react to each other and to situations in a spontaneous fashion can more easily win and keep audience affection. The banter between the Gibson Brothers, Darin & Brooke Aldridge, or Kenny & Amanda Smith endears them to audiences. Similarly, Rhonda Vincent's ability to key in on a particular fan's request, even from the stage wins over many people. Cynicism and hypocrisy are easily seen and annoy audiences no end. Humor can work for a band, but silliness is less endearing. Forced humor almost always falls flat.
Professionalism from a working band almost always works well in its favor. Professionalism never means being cold, distant, or unapproachable. Rather it suggests a series of behaviors that communicate themselves to the audience. A truly professional band can't show that it's disappointed when it takes the stage to a tent full of empty seats. It comes out and performs at its to level all the time. Professional bands perform with energy and commitment. They dress with an eye to the image they wish to project, but no particular form of dress works for each group. It's not necessary to come on stage wearing coats and ties or with shirts all tucked in, but a particular look contributes to a specific image. I've heard band members scoff at the idea of developing a business plan and then sticking to it, but thoughtful and careful planning seems to really pay off for most bands who want to succeed in this difficult and competitive business.
In the end, no band has “It” for every listener, but a surprising number of bands develop long and lasting appeal because they adhere to many, if not all, of the principles I've outlined above. They have a good and solid work ethic, but their appeal reaches beyond hard work to creating a total package that's distinctive, identifiable, and long lasting. Think about the bands that particularly appeal to you to see whether they reach these standards. If you're a member of a band, apply the ideas here to see where you need to make some changes and what has worked for you. Bands, and people, which find themselves stuck in unproductive behavior may make a splash for a while, but surely aren't going to succeed over the long haul.
Interesting article, Ted. I suggest that the "It" Factor transcends stage presence for some musicians. I say this because I sense "It" in recordings of musicians whom I've never seen.
ReplyDeleteIn those cases, it IS all about the music and the magical bridge that music can build between people that may have never been within 500 miles of each other. At the same time, the bridge is connecting the musician to thousands of other people who have never met. And when the musician plays live, the audience senses a bond of kindred spirit, not only with the musicians, but with each other.
The bands you favor leave me completely underwhelmed - I sense that you and I do not have a high level of kindred spirit. So maybe the "It" Factor starts with the listener. A band is considered to have "It" if they can stimulate a part of the listener's essence.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment. I actually tried to avoid mentioning any bands in my piece, but thought the matter of band interaction and the nature of Rhonda Vincent's bond with her audience were both important enough, and positive enough, to warrant greater specificity. I fear many examples I might have chosen where bands which one might expect to reach great heights, but don't seem to for lack of "It." I didn't want to do that.
ReplyDeleteI think few bands excel both in performance and in recording, but those that do have "It" in spades. Of course, you're correct in saying that "it" is often in the ears and spirit of the listener, nevertheless, certain performers demonstrate their quality even to those who don't care for the music they make.
I'd be interested to connect privately to share bands we might agree have "It" for us. You might be surprised. - Ted
Ted, excellent piece on the "it" factor. Much of the "it" factor comes from down right hard work, good planning, and continually improving your craft. There is also a piece that might just be "mysterious". When Tony Rice plays a passage (on a song like Shennandoah)it can evoke untold emotion, however when someone else plays the passage even with the same exact notes it may fall flat. It is almost a mysterious thing. I agree that you CAN'T fool people for very long if you are not genuine. This goes the same for songwriting. If a song is not "true, honest, authentic" people will see through it like broken window. But a song that come from the heart, and is true and authentic will touch the heart of the listener. "Soul" is many times what hits people. The singer/picker HAS to feel the music down deep and relay that to their audience. Some factors of the bands/artists that I love are "a humble spirit", "love for the music", "a giver's heart", a "Deep appreciation for the fans", "an unending willingless to better their craft", "PASSION", "great sense of humor", "strive for perfection but realize you won't ever get there", "a love of life and a loving spirit". And a little luck thrown in. I also agree that a band/artist MUST establish their own catalog of work that can be identified with them only. That can be acheived by writing themselves or by hopefully using songs by established songwriters searching out songs that "speak" to them. :) Sorry SSP :) anyway, great blog Ted!!!! Brink Brinkman
ReplyDeleteGood blog Ted....there are only two kinds of music, good and bad, and they usually are determined by the one listening, lol. The one thing that I hope people will do is not label music too much.....take the time to listen to something that is not normally what you usually listen to....you just might enjoy it...whatever band you enjoy, support them...
ReplyDeleteSee More
. It is hard work to be a musician, songwriter, or band and travel from date to date. If you enjoy their show, go by the record table, say hello, tell them how much you enjoyed them and maybe buy a cd and tell your friends about them....It all helps.
I'm not sure I can describe it but I know it when I see it. (Or hear it)
ReplyDeleteDr. B
Brother Tom - I used to like to tell my composition students, "If you can't say it or write it, you don't know what you think." The same principle applies here. I've been struggling with the question of not only why I like a particular band, but how it is they appeal to "their" audience. I can think of at least one band I despise, which draws audiences under the tent wherever they play. I don't get it, largely because they defy so many of the principles I've suggested above. Nevertheless, trying to enunciate an idea in print or at least in conversation helps me get my head around an idea and get a perspective on it. As always, thanks for your comment and continued support. See you next week. - Ted
ReplyDeleteTed,
ReplyDeleteI have to agree entirely. In many ways, it's like sports: the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. I've always said that in most sports, a "good team" can beat 5 "good players" any night. In some cases, a good team can beat 5 GREAT players.
The same is true of a band. Throwing "one each" of the best pickers together on stage may or may not result in the best band.
One way to judge "IT" is: Does every note, action, even "look" add to the group as a whole and not just to the individual. (Back to the concept of "There's no 'I' in 'Team'.")
I think the other key concept you came up with was that the groups who have "IT" are an "act." Do they just stand and play the music (oblivious to their surroundings) or is it even more enoyable WATCHING them play rather than just closing your eyes listening.
Song selection. You have to play what the audience wants to hear! I think you CAN do "all covers," but the key is to do them "like you" rather than try to do them "like the original." (I think if I read your comments correctly, we agree on that.) To remove this from bluegrass momentarily, Willie Nelson wrote a lot of songs, but he also did a TON of "covers." But, EVERY song he did, he did HIS way!
Finally, I have to agree that "IT" is in they eyes (and ears) of the beholder. Not too long ago, I had a discussion with someone regarding "Band X." He said he wouldn't pay a buck for their CDs, but he'd drive across the state to see them perform. For me, they have "IT" both ways. I already own most of their CDs (and will probably own them all eventually) and I HAVE skipped bigger name acts to see them instead. (They're "big," just not one of "the biggest" names according to most.)
Finally, I have to share a personal story. My band recently played a gig that featured 4 local bands. One of our "regular followers" dragged her "not so into bluegrass" husband along. After the gig, he said two things that made me proud. "We (were the only band that) looked like we cared that the audience was having a good time. And, he'd come back to see US again." I couldn't have been happier!
Bob
Bob - I don't know which Bob you are, but thanks so much for your thoughtful contribution. - Ted
ReplyDelete"There are so many players that play for show; and then there are some that play for the love. Man, you sure can tell the difference when you sit down and listen to them."—Doc Watson
ReplyDeleteI would imagine that quote somewhat goes against what the music industry thinks, and somewhat against what it takes to make a band popular or lucrative, but it's a great quote. I agree with it. Oh, I admit that I can be entertained by the bands that have their routines to reel in the crowd, and I can see through all of that to appreciate true musicianship, when it exists. But when it comes down to really enjoying the music and musicianship, I’d choose to listen to a certain relatively unknown, but awesome, duo playing on a week night in a small town restaurant over watching a well scripted or choreographed musical show by a popular band any day. Both require talents and knowledge that I do not possess. I’m sure I couldn’t do any of it, and I am not intending to insult in either situation.
"It" for me makes me think of a vocalist who, with his pure, velvety smoothe voice can evoke emotion from a stone-cold heart with his tender treatment of a love song, then turn right around and belt the blues like nobody's business with a voice that seems to resonate down in the depths of the audience's collective soul. The "It" factor also makes me think of a guitarist who, when he sits back, closes his eyes, and makes music, appears to be transported into his own world, completely unaware that anyone is out there listening. At the end of the song when he is transported back to us, it’s as if we’ve all taken a short journey together, and we will leave that place different from what we were when we entered it. That’s the power of music for music’s sake, and what the “It” factor is for me.
2cents - You're mistaken if you think I said it's about the show because I said it's not ALL about the music. I can easily identify bands I detest which are show bands, but are musically horrible as well as musically superior ones that I find to be a yawn. When you write about a vocalist whose voice can take you to new places, I'm certain that person knows how to sell a song through non-verbal presentation as well as his velvet smooth voice. Posture, expression, intonation, a certain hitch in his voice at just the right place...all these things come together to create a complete package. And they come together to provide "It." What you describe is the same quality a great actor has. He can communicate a clear sense of emotion and presence in a particular place because every time he says his lines, he feels the feeling. The same is true of a great singer. I once asked Russell Moore how he balanced recreating the feelings in a song with keeping sufficient control to keep on singing without breaking down. He said that was really the trick. If you remember a 1950's singer named Johnny Ray, you remember a man who gave in to raw emotion and lost control of his songs. Who plays Johnny Ray today? OTOH, why is it that Frank Sinatra is among the always to be remembered greats. Thanks for your incisive comment. - Ted
ReplyDelete