The Hanging Judge by
Michael Ponsor (Open Road Mystery & Thriller, 2013, 376 pages,
$16.99) is a legal procedural written by a sitting U.S. Circuit Court
Judge. It combines a rip-roaring tale of political and legal intrigue
spiced with the personal stories of believable characters leading
complex lives in a period of stress and distress. Rather than rely
upon stereotyped characters, Ponsor places each of them in a context
of challenging lives with lots of grey edges. The book suggests that
a capital trial, in addition to having the highest of stakes for the
defendant, presents levels of moral ambiguity to everyone involved in
bringing in a verdict. By seeking to present the characters from both
sides of the case in context, Ponsor enriches the reader's
understanding of the legal, moral, and personal issues in ways that
draw one in and then expand the universe. This is a well-crafted book
with few sharp edges and lots of opportunities to follow down false
paths, eventually leading to a satisfactory ending despite some of
the surprises Ponsor injects.
Set in
the declining cities of Holyoke and Springfield, Massachusetts, where
David Norcross is in his third year on the bench as U.S. District
Court judge, the case involves the murder in a driveby shooting of
drug dealer Peach Delgado and the incidental shooting of nurse Ginger
Daley O'Connor on a street in Holyoke. O'Connor is related to members
of the police force and on her way to a health clinic she helped to
found and where she volunteers, thus engendering lots of community
outrage. The case comes to the attention of the Attorney General in
Washington, D.C. because the current administration sees it as an
opportunity to hold a death penalty trial in Massachusetts, where
capital punishment has been abolished. The ambitious state U.S.
Attorney sees the trial as his ticket to advancement in the Justice
Department, as does Lydia Gomez-Larsen, the local Assistant U.S.
Attorney who must prosecute the case. Other characters view the
approaching trial through their own particular lenses – wife of the
accused, witness's mother, judge's clerks, police officers, drug
dealers' family members, and so-on all serve to enrich the complexity
of the crime and the trial, creating a thick, hearty soup of
intrigue, ambition, ambivalence, and ambiguity. Norcross, at the top
of this complex pyramid seeks to provide a fair trial while also
coming to terms with his own widowhood and desire not to preside over
a flawed trial. There are few stereotyped characters, yet the warp
and woof of intrigue draws the reader in. The trial is set off
against the 1806 execution of two men accused of a murder in
Springfield, quickly apprehended, and tried. This actual trial
echoes down through the history of western Massachusetts and imbues
the novel with added poignancy. The introduction of Claire Lindmann,
a local English professor, as Norcross' reawakened romantic interest
adds spice and drama to the narrative, which drives along a good
speed while never neglecting to reflect place and context through
effective use of description and dialogue.
Ponsor's
device of using the shadow trial from 1805 injects the issue of
differences and prejudice into the story. The two men tried 200 years
ago are Irish and Catholic in the still strongly Anglo-Saxon
Protestant area of western Massachusetts. But the composition of the
population of this area has changed. Now the police are predominantly
Irish and Catholic, while the bad guys are Hispanic and black. Thus,
racial and ethnic considerations join the political ones in this
developing case. The injection of the left-wing radical Novotny, who
sees the death penalty as an example of the corruption of the system,
adds spice as does a loopy character, Mrs. Abercrombie, pursuing her
own grievances by writing her briefs and showing up at inconvenient
moments.
Michael Ponsor
Michael
Ponsor graduated from Harvard, received a Rhodes Scholarship, and
studied for two years at Pembroke College, Oxford. After taking his
law degree from Yale and clerking in federal court in Boston, he
began his legal career, specializing in criminal defense. He moved to
Amherst, Massachusetts, in 1978, where he practiced as a trial
attorney in his own firm until his appointment in 1984 as a US
magistrate judge in Springfield, Massachusetts. In 1994, President
Bill Clinton appointed him a life-tenured US district judge. From
2000 to 2001, he presided over a five-month death penalty trial, the
first in Massachusetts in over fifty years. Judge Ponsor continues to
serve as a senior US district judge in the United States District
Court for the District of Massachusetts, Western Division, with
responsibility for federal criminal and civil cases in the four
counties of western Massachusetts. The Hanging Judge is his first
novel.
Michael
Ponsor's The Hanging Judge
(Open Road Mystery & Thriller, 2013, 376 pages, $16.99) is a
first rate legal procedural novel with plenty of thrills to go around
while never losing track of the issues surrounding capital
punishment. It's engaging and thought provoking, well-paced and
carefully plotted with no loose ends. A solid, professional job,
especially for a firt novel. The book is published by
Open Road Media, and is primarily available as an e-book,
although the ad on Amazon suggests it can be purchased as a
paperback, too. Open Road describes itself as an e-book publisher
making digital publications available across a variety of platforms.
This raises questions about what a book is, how we read, and what's
happening to the publishing industry. Does the emergence of
e-publishers further enrich the universe of available literature, or,
by interrupting the traditional editorial process, does it dilute the
quality of what's available? Judging from the high quality of this
book, readers can only benefit from publication becoming available to
an increasingly wide group of content producers. The book was
supplied to me by the publisher through Edelweiss. I read it on my
Kindle.
No comments:
Post a Comment