I'm tired of hearing people say, “It's
all about the music.” That phrase, meant to excuse bluegrass music
for the often static, not to say boring, way in which many
performances of bluegrass music present themselves just doesn't hold
water. In order to bring fans to their seats, great bands need to
present great shows sparkling with high concept performance values
which include great music and entertaining presentation. Without
both, people might come to see, but they won't stay to listen and
appreciate or return to keep the seats filled. Musicianship by
itself, isn't even the most important requirement, although it helps,
but high quality entertainment for audiences presented with more
entertainment choices than they've ever had requires much more.
Entertainment means creating more than
a highly scripted, carefully rehearsed and choreographed performance.
Jokes and schtick aren't sufficient. Neither is surpassing musical
ability. We can all point to bands filled with fine musicians, people
who distinguish themselves in sounding really good, yet which never
establish their own sound or create a new and distinctive personna, a
sound and personna which, after the first five or six notes, an
informed listener can say, “That's what I really like to hear.”
Rarely do we hear a new band which kicks off a song that appeals from
the first note, but that band, if it continues to choose its material
wisely, will attract an audience. As the music business changes and
develops in these days of cable television channels appealing to
niche audiences and bluegrass bands playing to full houses in
performing arts centers while everyone experiences a reduction in the
sales of recorded music, the question of how to reach out to new,
affluent audiences which can afford live entertainment is always
before us.
The bluegrass festival wasn't there at
the beginning nor is it a requirement that it continue to be the most
important means of delivering bluegrass to its fans, but festivals
still seek to attract large audiences to three and four day multiple
band outdoor events even when the weather is bound to be iffy and the
main stage performances are subject to the vagaries of sunshine,
rain, heat, cold, wind, and whatever else the outdoors will provide.
Remember that the early bluegrass musicians performed in auditoriums
to which they attracted fans by ceaseless travel and promotion
through local performances on radio. There were no festivals before
1965, well into the era which Bill Monroe kicked off in 1945 with a
live indoor performance at the Ryman Auditorium heard widely on the
radio. We're now forty-seven years beyond Fincastle and must ask
ourselves whether the format created by Carleton Haney remains the
best way to disseminate bluegrass music, if it ever was.
It's not easy to characterize what
makes a band entertaining, at least partly because its a matter of
personal choice. One thing's for sure, when multiple bands are
involved, not all bands need to be to everyone's taste. Within the
rubric of bluegrass, there are a remarkable number of very good bands
serving to entertain people with a variety of tastes and preferences.
Perhaps now we can point to several bands which are quite different,
musically strong, and deeply satisfying to their large fan bases. The
most obvious and, to many, interesting is Steve Martin and the Steep
Canyon Rangers. With the gifted comic, actor, writer, and banjo
player Steve Martin at the head, the Steep Canyon Rangers & Steve
Martin serves to introduce bluegrass to audiences who've never
encountered it before or who have preconceptions about the music far
removed from what it proves to be when the best bands perform. It
almost goes without saying that Steve Martin is a great entertainer
who brings in fans and commands high ticket prices and large fees.
What's obvious to those who've known the Steeps for years as a
stand-alone band is the impovement seen in their musicality from
their association with Martin. Together or as a standalone, this is
an entertaining show.
Another show catering to a quite
different audience is presented by Dailey & Vincent with their
combination of old bluegrass standards, country music, as well as
bluegrass gospel and southern gospel music. Their core bluegrass
sound is enhanced (altered) by the bass voice of Christian Davis, a
voice once confined to a capella quartets, but now used widely
throughout their performance. The band has upset the balance of
traditional bluegrass festivals by insisting on presenting one ninety
minute set rather than the traditional two sets, but audiences seem
to like the long program, and it's well suited to the concert halls
and performing arts series where they perform more frequently these
days. Other groups are also spreading their wings to other venues
than just traditional bluegrass markets. Rhonda Vincent & the
Rage and the Gibson Brothers are finding success and bringing
bluegrass to new audiences. It's also fairly easy to point to bands
of negligible musical ability who can, through sheer showmanship,
whether it's tasteful or not, keep audiences laughing and in their
seats.
As the festival season heats up, make
no mistake that it is limited by season and geography, so we should
welcome this transition to new environs, many in suburban and urban
areas where bluegrass has previously been limited to small clubs and
folk music outlets. The widening of the venues where bluegrass is
available means that newer audiences with different backgrouds and
experience will have the opportunity to hear the music. Whether they
return to hear it again, to watch it, to purchase CD's and support it
in other ways depends on how well they are entertained. In the end,
professional musicians will go in directions that assure they can
make a living. It's also clear that those new audiences are unlikely
to share the farm background and rural life ethos of the original
bluegrass fans. Most people today have either grown up in suburban or
urban settings or moved their by choice.
Entertainment values are just as
subjective as muscial ones. One person's humor is another's bad
taste. Five white guys standing in a row playing their instruments
well is sufficiently entertaining for some, while others are in
search of more. The honoring of the first and second generations of
bluegrass performers will continue as their songs and renditions
continue to be played and sung around the campfire. The line between
recreational singing along with semi-professional covers of the early
work and the truly professional bands will continue to bother some.
However, creativity can't be stopped if something resembling
bluegrass is to continue. We can only trust the market and believe
that Gresham's Law (bad money drives out good) doesn't apply to
music. If the success of the top entertaining bands is any
indication, excellence in music combined with good entertainment
values will always win out in the end. Look at who fills the seats!
Can You say Dry Branch Fire Squad?
ReplyDeleteNicely done,Ted. Bluegrass music can still be traditional and also embrace progression and change. Artists not only have to sound good, but capture their audience which is in an art in itself.
ReplyDeleteNicely done,Ted. Bluegrass music can still be traditional and also embrace progression and change. Artists not only have to sound good, but capture their audience which is in an art in itself.
ReplyDeleteA few off the cuff reactions:I
ReplyDeleteI must first say, Ted, this (and previous) essay provide an analogy for the entertainment - musicianship relationship. Just about the time I'm getting weary of your festival reviews you throw in a thought provoking number such as this one. Had your works focused on one or the other I'm not sure that even our friendship would have led me to return again and again!
On another point, we have always has a friendly disagreement about the Lewis Family work. I can take them ("him", actually) for about 15 minutes before I'm gone, but you find the "entertainment" and the "musicianship" to be balanced.
On the other side, from my perspective, is Bela Fleck and his group. I'm willing to overlook what I perceive as little "entertainment" and sit for hours with his "musicianship".
So there you go!
Nicely written Ted! I've often thought the "performing" part of performing musician gets overlooked and you've addressed that balance well! Enjoyed reading this and also the comments that ensued.
ReplyDeleteTed, as usual your essays are always thought provoking.
ReplyDeleteAs an older(?)survivor of the commerical end of Bluegrass music and the love of performing it, brings forward thoughts on those important elements in bluegrass show bussiness,ie "Musicianship and Entertainment" and one other important element "Putting food on the table". That last element probably was a real driving force for many early entertainers. Everett Lilly once told me "It was better than them coal mines". I'm quite sure there are a number of merging groups who may be having trouble with that last element now.
I was inspired by a number of early entertainers, some of who were not Bluegrass but as they say "Could really put on a show". Spike Jones, The Hosier Hot Shots for thier musical humor. A number of Jazz artists who could create excitement with their performances - Louie Armstrong. And Don Reno with Red Smiley who were probably more country than Bluegrass. Reno in his time was not only playing Bluegrass but old "pop" numbers on the banjo along with some orginal, pretty progressive stuff. These early Bluegrass artists were not myopic about their music nor had tunnel vision but were intested in finding some thing different to add to thier performnces to sell more records and bring more people to thier shows($)and to keep food on the table.
There is room for everyone's perspectives and styles of Bluegrass with enough traditional musicians and fans to keep this great music on keel. Allow the young enthusiasts room to experiment and respect those who continue to to play and honor the great early Bluegrass.
Enough already!
Al Hawkes
Ted, you crack me up.
ReplyDeleteTed, if I had to choose between "_____________________" (insert the name of one of YOUR favorite ENTERTAINING bands) and "________________" (insert the name of one of the BLAH traditional bands), I would pick the latter, 9 times out of 10. The reason for this is that I'm not willing to sacrifice my musical tastes just to see antics on stage. There are several iconic artists in bluegrass history who wouldn't pass your litmus test for entertainment value, yet they continue to shape the music because of their powerful influence. Tony Rice has never been a flamboyant figure on the stage, yet his name is synonymous with bluegrass guitar. Adam Steffey has influenced countless mandolin players, but he does not do this by deception and empty showmanship. J.D. Crowe.....oh hell, I could go on and on and on.....
ReplyDeleteIf you want entertainment dictated by popular opinion, watch "American Idol" or "America's Got Talent"; if you want authentic bluegrass....just listen.....this is an aural tradition, and no amount of light shows, fireworks or ass-shaking can change that.
First, I'd like to know who my most active commenter (anon) thinks is my
ReplyDelete"favorite" entertaining band. Second, although I have written about humor and entertaining a lot recently, I think I only have been particularly supportive of one "antic" player, Little Roy Lewis, who I see as an important linchpin to the early days of bluegrass music, overlooked, but very important. I agree entirely that some of the performers you've mentioned are both great musically and highly entertaining, largely because of their unsurpassed quality. There's more than enough bad taste and bad picking to go around. In the recording age, of course our response to much music must be aural. However, for those of us who attend live music, it remains more interesting if leavened by something beyond standing in a line and playing well. If I didn't say it loudly enough in my piece, I am not in favor of light shows or fireworks as a feature of bluegrass events, although I understand that the fireworks display at Red, White & Bluegrass is not only spectacular, but extremely well attended. Please don't put words, or intentions that aren't there, into my writing.
Truer words were never spoken, Ted. Bands that play in front of an audience should play for one reason, and one reason only: to entertain that audience. If they're not going to do that, then they might as well stick to jamming. My own favorites might not be the best singers or
ReplyDeletehottest pickers, but rather those bands who take seriously their mandate to entertain an audience.
It doesn't have to be scripted or obviously contrived, but it does require thought and effort. The important thing is authentically trying to do right by the audience. It can be as subtle as watching Ed Ferris manhandle a bass up to the microphone for a trio, or seeing Sonny Osborne trying (and utterly failing) not to laugh at an audience member who might have had a little too much to drink, or even just looking at
Melvin Goins' or Cousin Jake's big bow tie. Then again, it can be as
obvious as Little Roy dropping from the rafters, dressed like a drag queen, in the middle of
James King's set:-)
The most entertaining band I've seen in some time (unfortunately not live, rather via youtube) is
the wonderful Japanese band, Sugar on Top.
And whatever happened to band emcee work? But that probably deserves its own blog post...
Ted,
ReplyDeleteI have enjoyed your writing for years. You rightly hesitate to say anything negative about any band by name, and you make your point by saying nothing about the ones you don't care for. I've missed your point here though:
"It's also fairly easy to point to bands of negligible musical ability who can, through sheer showmanship, whether it's tasteful or not, keep audiences laughing and in their seats."
I can't point to one in the bluegrass world.
The Grascals work the crowd better than almost any band. They might not be at the top rank technically, but they're not lacking either, with banjo player of the year Kristen Scott Benson.
Rhonda Vincent is the best entertainer, of course. She hires top-flight musicians and presents a well-oiled show that the crowd loves, every single time.
Mountain Heart has changed their sound quite a lot in the last few years. I liked their older work better, but good for them for doing what works for them and their chosen audience.
Maybe you can supply an example of a band where showmanship outstrips musical ability, without darkening the band's reputation too much?
Anonymous - please either send me an email at keenevalleyguy@gmail.com or, if we're FB friends, contact me there. I'll be happy to engage in a private conversation with you. - Ted
ReplyDelete