Imagine that you've grown up in a small
rural village in northern New York state. Your father has spent his
life establishing a career in the relatively high salaried position
as a corrections officer in the regional state penitentiary. His
father worked as a jack-of-all trades doing logging in winter and
working for members of the summer community as a care taker for their
homes. Your mother, the daughter of subsistence farmers, cleaned
cottages and worked in the local grocery stocking shelves in summer
when the owners needed extra help. You attended the local school,
where the average graduating class varied between fifteen and twenty
members, and helped your mother with the housekeeping in summer
cottages from as early as you remember. You were a bright and pretty
girl, and one of the “summer people” took a liking to you as you
reached adolescence, offering to pay your tuition at an elite
boarding school in Massachusetts. Your parents jumped at the
opportunity and off you went to school.
On the first day there, you saw the
other kids coming to school in large SUV's and unloading clothing,
computers, and stereos, as well as strange long sticks with baskets
on the end and several pairs of skis each. You saw them greeting each
other after the summer with casual affection and tremendous
enthusiasm. You felt out of place, disconnected from all that was
familiar to you. At the same time, you realized you had been handed
an opportunity to change your circumstances and future beyond
anything you had previously imagined. You were bright and observant,
soon realizing that in order to fit in and succeed, much about you
would have to be altered. You'd need to learn to speak, walk, dress,
eat, and interact differently than you had ever seen others do or
imagined for yourself. How would you become a part of this
environment without losing your previous self? Could you find ways
to fit in? Did you really want to make yourself over? Would it be
possible for you to accomplish? Now, imagine that rather than being a
cute, curly haired blond, you were an African American or a Latina/o
with an clearly recognizable accent applying for admission to an
elite college or university, seeking employment in a law firm or
corporation, and trying to earn a promotion or partnership. How would
you work your personality? This, roughly, is the supposition of
Acting
White?: Rethinking America in a Post-Racial America by Devon
Carbado and Mitu Gulati (Oxford University Press, 2013, 240 pgs.
$29.95).
Written in the sometimes dense language
of legal scholarship, this small and important book uses actual cases
and numerous hypothetical situations (and alternatives) to clarify
and complicate the nuances, misunderstandings, and complications of
race, ethnicity, and gender in the American academy and workplace.
Devon Corrado and Mitu Gulati are law professors, at UCLA and Duke
respectively, who have been thinking about the issue of “working
identity” as they affect how people assimilate or seek to maintain
their identity while advancing in the American workplace. They place
racism into a different perspective by acknowledging that situational
factors and deeply held stereotypes contribute to creating a double
bind for those wishing to advance when they are not viewed as
insiders in an organization. By using thought experiments as well as
real world examples, the authors clarify the legal and social issues
confronting minorities in a changing world.
One of the governing ideas found in Acting White? is the “double bind.” As an example, they use President Barak Obama, who, when running for President, had to present himself as being “black enough” to be acceptable to the African American voters while being “white enough” to earn the votes of white voters. When he was confronted with the inflammatory language of the pastor of his church, he gave the famous speech on race that managed to negotiate these shoals sufficiently to allow his election. This example serves as a metaphor for the tricky landscape all minorities must master in the 21st century. So, for instance, an “employer who wants his African American employee to be black enough to function as window dressing for the firm ...but not so black as to create racial conflict or discomfort within the institution” is posited. (location 343 of 3788). The various examples and cases present the choices individuals make as being largely conscious strategies minority employees might utilize to fit into the position or institution. While the authors' argument is logically organized and tightly argued, it may be that they assert a consciousness (and perhaps cynicism) about decision making for employee and employer that may often be present, but more subtly than overt racism or sexism would be.
Arguments throughout the text raise
(and confirm) that the issue of racism and sexism is both more
pervasive and more subtle than the law or most discussions admit as
well as more difficult to counter than outright hostility would be.
The relational and internal calculus of joining, fitting in, and
prospering in any organizational setting places outsiders, whether
their outsiderness is attributed to being new or being different,
within a context of working to fit in. Such work is more fraught with
potential stumbling blocks for outsiders who are different in race,
gender, or sexual orientation, as well as possible physical
handicaps, religion, or national origin. This raises the issue of
intra-group differences in addition to inter-group differences. For
instance, what do black women signify by their decision to wear their
hair in braids, as natural, or smoothed? The case of Darlene
Jesperson vs. Harrah's Casino was an interesting study involving a
woman working as a cocktail waitress refusing to wear makeup. Such
considerations have implications beyond racial or sexual
discrimination.
Devon W. Carbado - UCLA Law School
Devon W. Carbado graduated from Harvard
Law School and teaches at UCLA School of Law where he specializes in
Constitutional Law as well as Critical Race Theory. He has twice been
named Professor of the Year. Mitu Gulati teaches at Duke School of
Law where he specializes in Corporate Law and employment
discrimination and critical race theory. One of his colleagues refers
to him as “a Renaissance man.” They have been writing together
about race and gender discrimination in the workplace and
organizations for a decade. In Acting
White?: Rethinking Race in a Post-Racial America they have
provided a valuable discussion for legal professionals and interested
lay people discussing the issues of race, gender, gender orientation
and the ways that those people must “work their identity” in
order to experience success. At times, the argument gets a little
deep in the weeds of complex legal argument, but is worth the effort
for the nuances it emphasizes and the difficulties in making
decisions for people seeking to overcome long-standing workplace and
school discrimination. Acting
White?
(240 pages, $29.95) will be published by the Oxford Univeristy
Press March 1, 2013 and may be available earlier. It was provided me
for review through Net Galley in an electronic edition.
Doesn't someone who is not white have to imagine, even conjecture how to "act" or think "white"? How does some kind of prejudice not sneak in there?
ReplyDeleteThat's the question. My example was chosen to provide an apt analogy for my largely white audience. This book, although focused on black, Latino, and gender issues has relevance for anyone moving into a new environment.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ted, this will be helpful, and I have it on my "wish" list.
ReplyDeleteBob C.